The United States Supreme Court, which happens to be dominated by liberal justices, takes an activist stance and strikes down the law based on a conflict with a very broad interpretation of the Constitution.Ī) This is acceptable the Supreme Court should be zealous in its duty of defending constitutional rights against potentially extremist statesī) This is unfortunate when something is not clearly prohibited, the Supreme Court should err in favor of states rightsĤ. A conservative Southern state makes a very strict law restricting the cases in which a woman can get an abortion. The news network decides they disagree with this kind of behavior and fire the anchor.Ī) This is acceptable the news network is acting within their rights and according to their principlesī) This is outrageous people should be judged on the quality of their work and not their political beliefsģ. The anchor of a major news network donates lots of money to organizations fighting against gay marriage, and in his spare time he writes editorials arguing that homosexuals are weakening the moral fabric of the country. However, their demonstration seems to be near a main street and it could be a minor inconvenience to the traffic trying to go through.Ī) Allow the neo-Nazis to demonstrate unmolestedī) Break up the demonstration on the grounds of ‘blocking traffic’Ģ. They seem to be pretty peaceful so far, so the First Amendment says you probably can’t get rid of them. Neo-Nazis are holding a demonstration in a small town, waving swastikas around and shouting about Hitler. Directions: Select either (a) or (b) for each of the twelve questions.ġ.
0 kommentar(er)
